10.4 RELEASE sees only one core
Luciano Mannucci
luciano at vespaperitivo.it
Wed Jan 10 15:59:27 UTC 2018
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:30:23 -0600
Adam Vande More <amvandemore at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think 11.x is better at this but:
Why? The Xeon E5410 went End Of Life in Q4 2010. Maybe the 9.something
looks more apropriate... :)
BTW, thanks I've missed that:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-May/050353.html
tough I have only 8 cores in total, which seems to me way under 64.
Interestingly, acpidump -d sees them:
root at baobab:~ # acpidump -d | less
/*
* Intel ACPI Component Architecture
* AML/ASL+ Disassembler version 20160527-64
* Copyright (c) 2000 - 2016 Intel Corporation
*
* Disassembling to symbolic ASL+ operators
*
* Disassembly of /tmp/acpidump.C4f1lO/acpdump.din, Wed Jan 10 16:24:27 2018
*
* Original Table Header:
* Signature "DSDT"
* Length 0x00006473 (25715)
* Revision 0x02
* Checksum 0xB9
* OEM ID "INTEL "
* OEM Table ID "S5400SF "
* OEM Revision 0x00000008 (8)
* Compiler ID "INTL"
* Compiler Version 0x01000013 (16777235)
*/
DefinitionBlock ("", "DSDT", 2, "INTEL ", "S5400SF ", 0x00000008)
{
Scope (\_PR)
{
Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU4, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU5, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU6, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
Processor (CPU7, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
}
or so I guess...
thanks again,
Luciano.
--
/"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy)
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250
X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster at sublink.sublink.ORG
/ \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list