Bind9 + TCP_FASTOPEN => no rndc

Christopher Sean Hilton chris at
Wed Sep 27 21:00:48 UTC 2017

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:17:20PM +0000, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:00:49PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:


> OK; I wasn't aware of bind911; looks as if that might be a shinier
> version of BIND 9:
> g1-252(11.1-S)[1] cd /usr/ports
> g1-252(11.1-S)[2] ls -Fd */bind*
> distfiles/bind-9.9.6.tar.gz     dns/bind911/
> distfiles/bind-9.9.7.tar.gz     dns/bind99/
> dns/bind-tools/                 dns/bindgraph/
> dns/bind9-devel/                net/bindtest/
> dns/bind910/
> g1-252(11.1-S)[3] svn info --show-item last-changed-revision
> 450729
> g1-252(11.1-S)[4] 
> So I'm running 9.9:

Yeah, that's a good option right now.

> You may want to take a look at Hiren's response to your query...
> and/or consider running dns/bind99 (which appears to be an "Extended
> Support Version").

I did look at his answer. I'm still at work so right now I'm basically
looking at my options. I actually don't need anything that's provided
by bind-9.11 so 9.10 or 9.9 is probably the right way to go.

-- Chris


      __o          "All I was trying to do was get home from work."
    _`\<,_           -Rosa Parks
Christopher Sean Hilton                    [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com]

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list