efrenba at gmail.com
Wed Oct 25 16:36:11 UTC 2017
I didn't realize about the map rule on my ipnat.rules from the old fw box.
Thank again for your support.
2017-10-25 4:07 GMT-04:00 Trond Endrestøl <
Trond.Endrestol at fagskolen.gjovik.no>:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:54-0400, Efren Bravo wrote:
> > @Ian Smith: gateway_enable="YES" I wrote ok, was my mistake when I copy
> > into the email and sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1. thanks
> > @Trond Endrestol
> > I didn't know about all those NATs (NAT44, NAT444, NAT64, etc), when I
> > installed a fw box 10 years ago they didn't exist, I think, because I
> > followed the same config and it worked. Now, the question is, how to make
> > it work?
> NAT(44) has been around for more than 20 years, and is partially
> responsible for delaying the deployment of IPv6.
> Read Section 29.5 on ipf (ipfilter) in the Handbook:
> Subsection 29.5.4 says how to configure NAT(44).
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions