Two pf questions

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:15:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:09:02 +1030, Wayne Sierke wrote:
>>Is there any reason that mktemp(1) is not adequate here, or not
>>desireable?
>  
>
>Since portability isn't a concern I don't think there is a reason, I
>just wasn't aware of http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/1/mktemp/.

There seems to be not really an issue regarding portability, apart from
me typing "mktmp" instead of "mktemp".