Unable to set rule using service name
kulamani.sethi at gmail.com
Mon Jul 17 05:04:12 UTC 2017
Thanks for your response!
Yes, it is a placeholders. Here is exact real example of service URL.
However it is a Intranet service, you may not access.
service URL1: https://vwddgdptv001.corp.intranet/RISC_1/GDPLogin.aspx
service URL2: https://vwddgdptv001.corp.intranet/GDPT_1/GDPLogin.aspx
Note: RISC_1 and GDPT_1 both are two different service running over a
I want to set some deny rule over RISC_1 only.
*With best Regards,*
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:43:56 +0530, Kulamani Sethi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I want to set a rule for a particular service URL which running on a
> > server.
> > I know the IP but don't know the port number where that service is
> > If i set rule for IP then it will applied for entire services running
> > there.
> > There is a option in IPFW rule we can set either port number or name,
> > it does not accepting using name. Here is a example for my case.
> > suppose URL for test1 service http://x.x.x.x/test1
> > URL for test2 service http://x.x.x.x/test2
> > I tried a rule, "ipfw add 104 deny log ip from x.x.x.x test1 to any".
> > error "ipfw: missing "to'' ".
> > *I want to set rule for test1 where I have no idea about port.*
> > *Also please help me how to know port number if any way is there.*
> RW well described (in freebsd-questions@) the relationship between port
> numbers and service names in /etc/services; assuming you know the name,
> that gives you the number. Are 'test1' and 'test2' real examples, or
> placeholders for real service names?
> In any case, you cannot specify a port number in a rule with proto 'ip';
> when specifying port/s you need to specify 'udp' or 'tcp' protocol.
> Can you give an example of the actual packets (protocol, port number/s)
> that you want to block?
> cheers, Ian
More information about the freebsd-questions