tinc and IPv6 routing, or: how to set up a local IPv6
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff
stdin at niklaas.eu
Sun May 22 18:54:04 UTC 2016
Mark Tinka [2016-05-20 17:33 +0200] :
> On 20/May/16 11:01, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
>
> > OK, thanks for the advice. I haven't grasped how IPv6 works
> > completely yet. So, NAT66 is for prefix rewriting, right?
>
> NAT66 is the equivalent of NAT44.
>
> > Where would I need that?
>
> I'd say never. NAT66 is mostly being used by those are like NAT44.
>
> NAT44 is useful because IPv4 addresses are in short supply. IPv6 is
> not in short supply, so NAT66 is not that useful, but that's just my
> opinion.
Okay, I get that. But I do not quite get how that was related to my
question?
> > Simple routing (as I tried to achieve) doesn't work here?
>
> Have you tried it without the firewall? Technically, I can't see
> a reason why it's not working, despite it being ULA.
I just disabled the firewall and tried it -- but without success.
> Don't wait. Get your IPv6 going sooner rather than later.
>
> I'd advise to use GUA's instead, but for your internal purposes, ULA's
> will work too.
I guess, I'll send a similar inquiry to tinc's mailinglist. Maybe the
issue is indeed related to tinc itself.
Anyway, thanks a lot for your advice!
Niklaas
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list