sh[it] and What am I missing here?
jon at radel.com
Mon Jun 6 03:34:36 UTC 2016
>> It does need the suffix .sh because if it is missing I fail to
>> function...... the computer does just fine.
> No, if this is the case you are doing something weird. The filename does
> not matter, and the extension is just part of that filename.
Perhaps you should read what he wrote again? He's already agreed that FreeBSD doesn't need the extension. It's more a personal problem--I can only surmise he confuses himself less when he labels his files with hints as to their type.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2557 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-questions