Virtualization on FreeBSD
Paul Pathiakis
pathiaki2 at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 30 12:08:13 UTC 2015
Agreed. I just recently (earlier this week) installed VBox on 2
machines, it works just fine. *shrug*
However, moving on, have you looked at jails?
I have over 20 jails running on a single 6 core CPU machine and
everything is smooth and nice. :-)
P.
On 07/30/2015 06:57, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Kyle wrote:
>
>>
>> I've recently installed FreeBSD on my home server to replace my linux
>> install after getting frustrated with some of the newer software.
>>
>> I'll prefix this question by saying I really like FreeBSD much better
>> so far, except for the following.
>>
>> One thing I really liked about my previous system was KVM, Linux's
>> kernel-supported virtualization. It always worked really well.
>>
>> I've been trying VirtualBox, QEMU, and bhyve with FreeBSD as a host,
>> but none of them seem to work anywhere near as well as the KVM on Linux.
>>
>> VirtualBox seemed to have issues with the networking.
>
> In what way? It has worked pretty well for me. I generally use NAT
> unless PXE-booting a VM, then use bridged networking. The PCnet-PCI
> II (Am79C970A) works for either, the Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop
> (82540EM) also works well but I think I added the adapter PXE code
> because it was not included. There are instructions for this
> somewhere, but it's not really needed because the first adapter can be
> used.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list