Questions about freebsd-update
freebsd at edvax.de
Fri Jul 10 19:09:01 UTC 2015
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:57:20 -0400, Quartz wrote:
> >>> The tools involved here are already part of the base system (except
> >>> they got manually removed, which renders the OS somehow incomplete).
> >>> A system installation typically uses compiler, assembler, linker,
> >>> installer, and make, which are all contained in the base distribution
> >>> of the OS.
> >> Wait.... isn't all the build stuff part of the 'src' option during
> >> install?
> > No. The "src" distribution contains the sources which will
> > be available in the /usr/src subtree.
> >> If you unselect that, how does make/install apply patches if
> >> the files it's patching aren't there?
> > It doesn't do that, but the tools make, install, and patch
> > themselves will be available.
> I understand that the utils themselves are still installed regardless,
> but in order for the 'patch' command to have something to patch against,
> doesn't 'src' have to be installed also?
Yes, /usr/src _has to be_ present - either by installing src.txz,
as a result of freebsd-update's component src, or via SVN checkout.
The process then involves building from source of course. This is
the most transparent way to deal with updates.
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions