freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 4

Manish Jain bourne.identity at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 15 13:40:15 UTC 2015


Hi,

Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to 
FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous 
"GLIBC_2.11 not found" message.

Regards

Manish Jain
+91-98995-82709


On 01/15/2015 17:30, freebsd-questions-request at freebsd.org wrote:
> Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to
> 	freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	freebsd-questions-request at freebsd.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	freebsd-questions-owner at freebsd.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org self signed Cert (Florian Heigl)
>     2. Re: Help vote for FreeBSD (Ireneusz Pluta)
>     3. ssh_explicit_bzero error on upgrade to 9.3-RELEASE-p8
>        (William Yardley)
>     4. Business Invoice (lurlenemaddox at yahoo.com)
>     5. Switching from custom kernel back to generic (Doug Hardie)
>     6. Re: Switching from custom kernel back to generic (krad)
>     7. Re: Switching from custom kernel back to generic (Erich Dollansky)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:36:53 +0200
> From: Florian Heigl <florian.heigl at gmail.com>
> To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
> Subject: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org self signed Cert
> Message-ID: <397D5A8E-6497-4015-9D61-3D196EF22ADE at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if this has been brought up before but didn?t see anything about it.
> The EU SVN mirror is running a selfsigned cert, while the US one is running with a public accepted cert.
>
> The documentation has the fingerprint for the certificate, it can be found at:
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html
>
>
> Honestly it would be a lot easier to simply use a valid and public certificate for each of the SVN mirrors.
> By now we should all have learned that any, really any slight chance of attack is being abused.
>
> With a self signed cert we offload the problem to all users to actually verify the cert each time they do a fresh checkout.
> Even better, with a self-signed cert we won?t have any CRL support, right? Or is there a CRL provided for them?
> (Disclaimer, mostly this depends on that feature ?ever? being added to SVN anyway)
>
> I hope this plea reaches the right set of eyes for consideration.
> Since the SVN page asks to send any questions to -questions instead of mirrors/infra, i?m sending it here.
>
>
> tl;dr
> Please: ditch any self signed certs from freebsd source and build infra chain.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:20:25 +0100
> From: Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta at wp.pl>
> To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD at ShaneWare.Biz>,
> 	freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Help vote for FreeBSD
> Message-ID: <54B74E19.5040605 at wp.pl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>
> W dniu 2013-10-10 o 08:21, Shane Ambler pisze:
>> On 10/10/2013 16:15, opendaddy at hushmail.com wrote:
>>> Keep them coming guys! Couple hundred more and FreeBSD will top the list:
>>>
>>> https://digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/filters/top
>>>
>>> This would be great PR for FreeBSD too.
>>>
>>
>> It appears to be tagged as started, which should mean they are in the
>> process of adding bsd options. Even if it isn't the most popular topic.
>
> ... they did it:
>
> https://www.digitalocean.com/company/blog/presenting-freebsd-how-we-made-it-happen/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:52:51 -0800
> From: William Yardley <freebsd-questions at veggiechinese.net>
> To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
> Subject: ssh_explicit_bzero error on upgrade to 9.3-RELEASE-p8
> Message-ID: <20150115065251.GC44091 at aura.veggiechinese.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I just did the freebsd-update upgrade to 9.3-RELEASE-p8 (from -p7), but
> I'm getting the error described here:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-July/079332.html
>
> aura:# freebsd-update fetch
> [...]
> The following files will be updated as part of updating to
> 9.3-RELEASE-p8:
> /lib/libcrypto.so.6
> /usr/bin/kinit
> /usr/bin/ntpq
> /usr/bin/openssl
> /usr/bin/sftp
> /usr/bin/slogin
> /usr/bin/ssh
> [...]
> aura:# freebsd-update  install
> Installing updates...
>
>   done.
> aura:# /etc/rc.d/sshd restart
> Performing sanity check on sshd configuration.
> /usr/sbin/sshd: Undefined symbol "ssh_explicit_bzero"
> aura:# freebsd-update  rollback
> Uninstalling updates... done.
> [ssh then will restart again]
>
> # uname -r
> 9.3-RELEASE-p5
> [in /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh]
> REVISION="9.3"
> BRANCH="RELEASE-p7"
>
> Running freebsd-update IDS reports failures on just about everything:
>
> /usr/bin/mailq is a symlink to ../../usr/sbin/sendmail, but should be a symlink to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper.
> /usr/bin/mailx has SHA256 hash e1fb82f4a59304d296e9843fb37e0b0cc8f207ec0a4a368c20da80efc28253f0, but should have SHA256 hash a109467da955405f3f9d978fea19fadd15e95b7164a8e7c356f373af99b0d654.
> /usr/bin/make has SHA256 hash 66e297063b25a7606b3158eda398fe6c5921ba8b41b5fbeffe130ec7b7184b88, but should have SHA256 hash dc780fb784f812c2c2f1fd7015767373000963face7acad9fe7295af3aea9405.
> [etc., etc.]
>
> I've already tried moving /var/db/freebsd-update out of the way.
>
> I also had an issue with a locally modified mergemaster.mtree, so I
> moved that out of the way, but no change.
>
> Any suggestions for how to get my system back on track?
>
> Base system has been updated using freebsd-update all along, including
> an update from 8.X.
>
> w
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:50:07 -0500
> From: "lurlenemaddox at yahoo.com" <lurlenemaddox at yahoo.com>
> To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
> Subject: Business Invoice
> Message-ID: <54B71CCE.40CFD49B at yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello.
> Thank you for choosing our services.
> I've attached the invoice for your convenience.
>
> Invoice Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015
> Cordially yours,
>
> DAVID CAMPBELL
> Dir of Rev. Cycle
> Erik Johnson
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: Invoice.doc
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 36864 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20150115/a928448f/attachment-0001.obj>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:10:49 -0800
> From: Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org>
> To: "freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Questions"
> 	<freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
> Subject: Switching from custom kernel back to generic
> Message-ID: <4DE6D94C-177B-471B-B537-F7853B83115A at lafn.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I believe I will be able to get rid of using quotas here in the near future.  That would enable me to use generic kernels all around.  However, I ran into an issue when updating 9.3.  I used freebsd-update to bring everything up to speed.  Then I went ahead and built the custom kernel and rebuilt world.  However, I just installed the generic kernel freebsd-update gave me.  The generic kernel kldstat showed the kernel and fdescfs.ko.  However, pf.ko and pflog.ko would not load.  It said it couldn?t find them.  Running ktrace on service pf start shows it was looking for /boot/kernel/pf.ko and getting file not found.  A ls -l /boot/kernel/pf.ko shows the file is there with the right owner and permissions.  I tried manually loading other modules and get the same error.  All the modules are there in the right place.  I ended up installing the custom kernel and world and everything now works again.
>
> Is there some magic that is needed to switch from a custom kernel to generic?  Why would the kernel not find the modules when ls can?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:07:36 +0000
> From: krad <kraduk at gmail.com>
> To: Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org>
> Cc: "freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Questions"
> 	<freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: Switching from custom kernel back to generic
> Message-ID:
> 	<CALfReyeUKPPFna8f8vBvW9qwiUrjSfJiFCs3dDD8Mv3iG+X4zw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> It depends on what was there before hand but the simplest way to revert to
> stock is to do the following
>
> backup /boot
> rename /boot/kernel to /boot/kernel.old
> fetch -o -
> http://mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/9.3-RELEASE/kernel.txz
> | tar xvzf - -C /
>
> you should now have a stock kernel in place. You of will want to check the
> url above as you might want to change it to a different arch, or
> geolocation to suit you
>
> On 15 January 2015 at 09:10, Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org> wrote:
>
>> I believe I will be able to get rid of using quotas here in the near
>> future.  That would enable me to use generic kernels all around.  However,
>> I ran into an issue when updating 9.3.  I used freebsd-update to bring
>> everything up to speed.  Then I went ahead and built the custom kernel and
>> rebuilt world.  However, I just installed the generic kernel freebsd-update
>> gave me.  The generic kernel kldstat showed the kernel and fdescfs.ko.
>> However, pf.ko and pflog.ko would not load.  It said it couldn?t find
>> them.  Running ktrace on service pf start shows it was looking for
>> /boot/kernel/pf.ko and getting file not found.  A ls -l /boot/kernel/pf.ko
>> shows the file is there with the right owner and permissions.  I tried
>> manually loading other modules and get the same error.  All the modules are
>> there in the right place.  I ended up installing the custom kernel and
>> world and everything now works again.
>>
>> Is there some magic that is needed to switch from a custom kernel to
>> generic?  Why would the kernel not find the modules when ls can?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:08:59 +0800
> From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist at alogt.com>
> To: Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org>
> Cc: "freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Questions"
> 	<freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: Switching from custom kernel back to generic
> Message-ID: <20150115190859.3ab50085 at X220.alogt.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:10:49 -0800
> Doug Hardie <bc979 at lafn.org> wrote:
>
>> I believe I will be able to get rid of using quotas here in the near
>> future.  That would enable me to use generic kernels all around.
>> However, I ran into an issue when updating 9.3.  I used
>
> you ave already one hint that should work. The other would be to build
> a 'custom' kernel using the GENERIC configuration file.
>
> Erich
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 4
> *************************************************
>


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list