MITM attacks against portsnap and freebsd-update
nino80 at gmail.com
Tue May 20 06:51:33 UTC 2014
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:03 AM, David Noel <david.i.noel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/19/14, Alnis Morics <alnis.morics at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 05/19/2014 23:28, David Noel wrote:
> >> I also think it would be an appropriate time to discuss retiring
> >> portsnap.
> > Subversion checkouts and updates take much more time than Porstnap.
> My experience has been that both portsnap and svn update typically
> take under a minute to complete.
> Regardless, don't most people run this in the background with portsnap
I don't. And I don't regularly update the ports tree.
When you regularly update ports tree, the diffs svn update needs to pull
are relatively small. When you update, say, once a month, portsnap in my
experience gets the job done a lot quicker.
More information about the freebsd-questions