changes to base system DNS
Robert Huff
roberthuff at rcn.com
Sat Mar 15 21:11:15 UTC 2014
> "rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*" on the old and new systems
> and compare the locations of named vs. local_unbound?
On the current system, named comes up as number 74.
Would someone who uses only unbound report how it works for them?
Better yet - someone who's using port.bind?
> So it depends on what capability you are looking for as to whether it
starts earlier or later. (No easy answers here.)
Short version: this system is authoritative for its zone, so a
caching-only resolver is no good.
Using system bind worked fine; everybody found everything they
needed at the right time.
I don't grok the rcorder system: it is my impression that
everything in /etc/rc.d is provessed independently and before
/usr/local/etc/rc.d. If that's true, then it seems like named might
start after things that need its services.
Respectfully,
Robert Huff
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list