Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
feenberg at nber.org
Sun Jul 20 22:26:07 UTC 2014
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> And you don't seem to get the point that _someone_ has to do the work.
>>> No one has stepped up so far, so nothing is going to change.
> Franco Fichtner said he's interested in doing it. He probably
> needs funding.
>> No one with authority has yet said that "If an updated pf were available,
>> would be welcomed".
> Which person or group would you view as "authority" in this case ?
I am not privy to the inner workings of the project, but surely a
decision of this importance would come to the attention of the
core team, who are listed at:
A port of OpenBSD PF may be quite impractical or undesirable- I have no
idea. However, if all potential contributions are viewed as criticism to
be refuted, it will damage the ability of the project to attract
contributors. Rather than telling a potential contributor that their
efforts will never be included in the official distribution it would be
more supportive of the project to say that a port of PF would be welcome
as a port, but might have difficulty displacing current offering. That
doesn't promise anything, but encourages involvement, if indeed
involvement is desired.
> pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
More information about the freebsd-questions