Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

Lars Engels lars.engels at 0x20.net
Sun Jul 20 12:39:23 UTC 2014

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:18:54PM +0100, krad wrote:
> all of that is true, but you are missing the point. Having two versions of
> pf on the bsd's at the user level, is a bad thing. It confuses people,
> which puts them off. Its a classic case of divide an conquer for other
> platforms. I really like the idea of the openpf version, that has been
> mentioned in this thread. It would be awesome if it ended up as a supported
> linux thing as well, so the world could be rid of iptables. However i guess
> thats just an unrealistic dream

And you don't seem to get the point that _someone_ has to do the work.
No one has stepped up so far, so nothing is going to change.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20140720/9eef8da5/attachment.sig>

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list