Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1

Michael Sierchio kudzu at tenebras.com
Wed Jan 29 22:13:10 UTC 2014


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf.

Kernel nat for ipfirewall requires a custom kernel (GENERIC does not
have LIBALIAS).

- M


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list