NAT question

Adam Vande More amvandemore at
Wed Aug 13 17:50:21 UTC 2014

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Luciano Mannucci <luciano at
> wrote:

> Hello, I'm still migrating machines from linux to FreeBSD. I'm wondering if
> my translation from this iptables linux rule
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s -d -o
> eth1 -j
> (which means moreless if Mr wherever he comes fom passes
> through our eth1 interface to go to 172.16.1 network should get our
> eth1 address instead of his)
> is moreless correctly translated in FreeBSD ipnat rules as
> map em0 -> 0/32
> or I'm missing something?

You might want to use a more integrated and supported FW such as IPFW or PF
to do NAT.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list