viewing major and minor device numbers
FreeBSD at ShaneWare.Biz
Sat Oct 26 03:21:37 UTC 2013
On 26/10/2013 09:01, David Newman wrote:
> In this case I'm OK going with devfs, but thanks for clearing up why the
> output is different in 9.x.
> I suppose one could say this "breaks" mknod, or at least makes it much
> harder to use. But since the same thing is available from devfs, and it
> doesn't require messing with device numbers, I guess it's OK.
Sounds to me like the old way is beginning to break, and may be ready
>From man mknod under compatibility -
As of FreeBSD 5.0, device nodes are managed by the device file system
devfs(5), making the mknod utility superfluous.
More information about the freebsd-questions