mount_smbfs in base?

Fri May 31 19:12:29 UTC 2013

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Quark <unixuser2000-fbsd at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I saw that, but suspected I must have done something stupid that those binaries got placed there.
>
>>
>>>  then what is extra in samba port?
>>
>> a SMB client and server
>
> so this SMB client is recentish than what is in base?

Yes.

> I 'guess' samba was GPL, is it OK to let live GPL s/w in base when such strides are being attempted to oust GCC?

mount_smbfs isn't GPL.

--
Adam Vande More