wblock at wonkity.com
Wed Jun 26 12:40:29 UTC 2013
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, David Demelier wrote:
> 2013/6/26 Mike Jeays <mike.jeays at rogers.com>:
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:56:59 +1000
>> julius <juliuscmontes999 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Which BSD for a user desktop ??!.
>>> I all ready have Linux mint but I like to try again, in the past I have
>>> use it but no luck in dual booting system with windows and I have try to
>>> follow youtube BSD users that gave instructions on the BSD and no luck.
>>> Everybody that I watch in youtube for instruction it hasn't work even
>>> loading the BSD on is own hasn't work.So which BSD for a user desktop??!
>>> Thank you
>> PC-BSD is a good place to start; it makes installation easy.
>> I prefer running Windows in a VM under VirtualBox to dual-booting. Switching
>> between the two is much faster, and you can make the host file system visible
>> to the guest with Samba.
> The only drawback of this is performance. Or you have a very powerful
> machine :-)
The VM guests run pretty quick, at least if the host CPU has VT-x or
AMD-V. Check the BIOS, Intel VT-x is sometimes disabled there. I have
not benchmarked but would estimate it to be 80-90% equivalent CPU speed,
maybe a bit less for disk I/O depending on the virtual disk type.
Windows in a VM also has the benefit of being able to move the VM to a
different host without having to reinstall the operating system in the
VM. But overall, the best feature is that the VM host and guest run at
the same time.
More information about the freebsd-questions