wine-fbsd64 -- no longer in ports

[C. P. Ghost]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing <hexhexing at gmail.com> wrote:
> perryh at pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes:
>
>> Bernt Hansson <bah at bananmonarki.se> wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>> > # portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64
>>> >   ===>>> No /usr/ports/emulators/wine-fbsd64 exists, and no information
>>> >   ===>>> about emulators/wine-fbsd64 can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED
>>> > hints?
>>> There has never been such a port, you have to install from package.
>>
>> Ordinarily, packages are created by building ports.
>> If this one is an exception, how is it created?
>
> I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or
> /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK.

Nope, not for amd64:

% grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine/Makefile
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386
% grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel/Makefile
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386

The wine and wine-devel ports won't even compile on amd64.

There was some guy who claims to have managed creating a
binary _package_ for amd64 somehow, and wo sent periodic
announcement updates about to this list. I don't know if it was
legit or not: I never install stuff bypassing ports. But apparently,
he didn't create a _port_, nor did he modify/enhance the current
i386-only wine ports.

> The name 'wine-fbsd64' looks strange. You installed it before? and
> when did you find this name?

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/