[ports] why no libXXX after make install of libXXX?
freebsd at dreamchaser.org
Sat May 26 20:03:28 UTC 2012
I'm trying to install audacious, which depends on libmowgli.
The port fails to build because of a missing library.
Shouldn't the build of a library result in the library being placed in /usr/local/lib?
make -v install
===> libmcs-0.7.2_1 depends on shared library: mowgli.2 - not found
===> Verifying install for mowgli.2 in /usr/ports/devel/libmowgli
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
=> libmowgli-1.0.0.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch http://distfiles.atheme.org/libmowgli-1.0.0.tar.bz2
libmowgli-1.0.0.tar.bz2 100% of 103 kB 128 kBps
===> Extracting for libmowgli-1.0.0
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for libmowgli-1.0.0.tar.bz2.
===> Patching for libmowgli-1.0.0
===> Building for libmowgli-1.0.0
===> Installing for libmowgli-1.0.0
===> Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if devel/libmowgli already installed
===> Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
===> Registering installation for libmowgli-1.0.0
===> Returning to build of libmcs-0.7.2_1
Error: shared library "mowgli.2" does not exist
I had originally installed some packages, including gnome.
I thought I had removed all of them before building ports.
When the above error first occurred, there was a
In trying to fix things, a make deinstall removed them,
and no subsequent make install has put them back.
I'm guessing they were left-over from a package install.
More information about the freebsd-questions