Off topic: NetBSD or OpenBSD for Alpha server ?
freebsd at edvax.de
Fri May 4 22:37:03 UTC 2012
On Fri, 4 May 2012 17:11:00 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
> For obselete hardware one frequetly has no alternative but to run an
> obselete operating system.
Depending on the actual intention of use, it _may_ be no
problem to use obsolete operating systems and software.
(For example, I still have a FreeBSD 5.4 system with lots
of applications installed, perfectly working on a 300 MHz
system, intended for "special purposes"; I would _never_
use that as a server facing the Internet!)
> The OP has already decided on a *BSD. Recommending VMS, of any form, is
> not a 'helpful'/'responsive' response to his questions. You *don't*know*
> _why_ he has selected *BSD, so you have _no_ idea whether VMS is viable
> or his needs.
> Given that he -needs- a *BSD on _that_ hardware which which 'flavor' would
> you recomend? Or would you insist he discard that hardware and replace
> it with something current? inquiring minds want to know. *grin*
It there is a _required_ reason to run Alpha hardware, an
older FreeBSD OS isn't a bad choice. Depending on the
availability of sources (per /usr/ports of _that_ version)
or of packages (from the installation media of _that_ version,
or $PACKAGESITE pointing to the correct archives on the FreBSD
FTP server), software can be installed. There's also the
excellent tool "portdowngrade". However, it may be a "try & miss"
to find out what software still runs, what _current_ software
can be made running, and what operation procedures still work.
This _ALL_ depends on what the system should be used for.
Only the OP can decide about what applies, and what doesn't.
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions