PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au
Sun Mar 4 23:01:22 UTC 2012
On 03/05/12 07:23, jb wrote:
> Chuck Swiger<cswiger<at> mac.com> writes:
>> There are lots of people who are looking for turnkey / "no docs needed"
>> systems, with "give me simplified choices" but "handle obvious errors with a
>> nice dialog window or fix-it 'wizard'", instead of requiring CLI sysadmin
>> experience, reading error logs, and running diagnostic commands to fix things.
> Well, the PC-BSD team set these goals for themselves:
> "PC-BSD has as its goals to be an easy-to-install-and-use desktop operating
> system, based on FreeBSD. To accomplish this, it provides a graphical
> installation to enable even UNIX novices to easily install and get it running."
> That's also an obligation to test it.
> PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them.
PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them
a private company.
>> I suspect that the folks who define usability by such criteria are not using
>> FreeBSD (or PC-BSD) at all, or they quickly evaluate it and then move on at
>> the first major showstopper they come across.
> There were many attractive features implemented.
> I personally am irritated when I get a software product that breaks on a basic
> usability test. The argument that something is offered to me for free and so
> I can not expect it to function here and there does not fly with me. That's
> a road to nowhere, considering that they do offer it freely.
> I will test their next public release in more detail.
> I would love to report back words of praise.
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions