joe.gain at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 18:25:31 UTC 2012
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Stas Verberkt <legolas at legolasweb.nl> wrote:
> Mark Felder schreef op 21-06-2012 19:28:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:31 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
>> <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>>> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
>> This has not been decided in court yet.
> Additionally, the exceptions for using the GCC runtime library for non-GPL
> is limited to what hey call "eligible compilation processes", what rules out
> proprietary GCC plugins or other combinations of core GCC functionality with
> tooling and extensions.
> Please note that this is indeed not tested in court. Therefore, reality may
> turn out
> even more interesting. That's why a lawyer's answer should always be "it
> depends". :)
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
So, has anyone compared the performance of clang vs gcc compiled in daily use--
for example as a server? Anyone can cherry pick a couple of binaries, but how
important is this for the performance of FreeBSD world?
+49 (0)7531 60389
(...otherwise in ???)
More information about the freebsd-questions