Is ZFS production ready?

Wojciech Puchar wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Thu Jun 21 15:43:04 UTC 2012


>
> I think it is incorrect to assume that a failure with ZFS that cannot be 
> recovered could be recovered if you used UFS with fsck.
i think it is incorrect to not read carefully.

So explanation - ZFS failure NOT caused by disks failure cannot be usually 
recovered.

But even if i am wrong at this, rest still apply.

> What fsck fixes in 
> other file systems doesn't apply to ZFS by ZFS's design.    fsck deals with 
> fixing superblock inconsistancies on non-journaled file systems (like 
> UFS/UFS2), not resurecting corrupted blocks on a disk.
>
> http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6071-No,-ZFS-really-doesnt-need-a-fsck.html
yes i know that article.

And it is truly funny for me to know people do think this way.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list