Is ZFS production ready?
Wojciech Puchar
wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Thu Jun 21 15:43:04 UTC 2012
>
> I think it is incorrect to assume that a failure with ZFS that cannot be
> recovered could be recovered if you used UFS with fsck.
i think it is incorrect to not read carefully.
So explanation - ZFS failure NOT caused by disks failure cannot be usually
recovered.
But even if i am wrong at this, rest still apply.
> What fsck fixes in
> other file systems doesn't apply to ZFS by ZFS's design. fsck deals with
> fixing superblock inconsistancies on non-journaled file systems (like
> UFS/UFS2), not resurecting corrupted blocks on a disk.
>
> http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6071-No,-ZFS-really-doesnt-need-a-fsck.html
yes i know that article.
And it is truly funny for me to know people do think this way.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list