Why Clang

[Chad Perrin]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>>but not to be turned into closed source products.
> >>
> >>What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called
> >>"forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open
> >>your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball...
> >
> >Give him a break.  His heart is in the right place, though his choice of
> 
> GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom.
> 
> But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO
> nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons
> to use clang.

1. This has nothing to do with what I said.

2. I prefer Clang.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]