Why Clang

[Wojciech Puchar]

>> scratch and this resulted with thing 5 times larger,
>
> *YOUR* measurement of sizes was faulty.  <grin>

be more exact.

>> old bloated gcc is just funny.
>
> You _do_ understand that they could not use -any- of the technology
> implementations in GCC, that they had to redevelop everything from
> scratch, right?

even stated this.

> I'm sure that you _also_ are aware that a larger program size does *NOT*
> necessarily mean 'bloat'.

of course. really i can write programs.

and really - i don't understand all this fuss about "better error 
reporting".

Really i don't have problems to read gcc error messages when i compile my 
programs.