fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com
Sat Jul 21 11:29:06 UTC 2012
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:18:48 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
> Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
> > Indeed.
> > But getting GELI certified and approved by the relevant
> > institutions and agencies isn't that easy either. Yet without
> no idea what are you talking about.
Then you would be well advised to keep pie-hole shut. Doing otherwise,
as Lincoln put it, "removes all doubt."
> As for any government agencies and corporations why you care about their
Does it even *occur* to you that some people use FreeBSD in _business_
operations? Business (or even government) operations which just might
have to comply with _laws_ that limit them to using resources that have
been "certified" as doing what the law requires such tools do?
C.P. has made it clear that she _is_ in am environment where compliance
with government edicts on the subject of security _is_ an operational
requirement. Including the mandatory use of 'certified' solutions for
particcular issues. In her environment, geli could be used 'in addition
to' a mandatory, "certified" solution, but *NOT* 'by itself' as a means
of dealing with that mandatory requirement -- because it is *not* and
approved and 'certified' means of satisfying that requirement.
Whether or not you agree with, or even _understand_, the nature of the
requirement is immaterial, and irrelevant to C.P.'s situation.
She _does_ have to deal with those requirements, which you do not -- your
lack of comprension of that =fact= not withstaning.
More information about the freebsd-questions