ports vs packages
Matthew Seaman
m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Tue Jan 10 10:16:19 UTC 2012
On 10/01/2012 09:23, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote:
> Would be nice to know if there any plans on switching to pkgng or any other pkg management
> system in a future.
pkgng is under active development with the stated aim of replacing the
current packaging system. If you want to get involved, check out the
#pkgng channel on irc.freenode.net
It's still too early in the pkgng development cycle for a decision to
have been made about if and when it becomes the new standard packaging
system. Given it is such a major infrastructure change the switch over
will have to be carefully managed and I'd expect there to be a lot of
activity over on freebsd-ports@ while it is all in beta.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20120110/85faa5fc/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list