Matthew Seaman m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Sun Nov 20 07:37:35 UTC 2011

On 19/11/2011 23:26, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Seaman
> <m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
>> If you compile your own kernel, then freebsd-update will patch the
>> kernel sources, but leave you to rebuild and reinstall your customized
>> kernel.
>> I don't know about the -p4 update.  By rights it should have involved
>> updating the kernel by one or other of the two methods shown.  So far
>> however, we've seen two reports questioning that[*] and none saying that
>> the -p4 update did in fact update the kernel.  Which is suspicious, but
>> hardly conclusive.
> Do you compile your own kernel, or do you have a machine that uses
> GENERIC?  If you do, what is the output of uname -a on it?

Me personally?  No, in general I track -STABLE on my systems.  Try
asking the OP.


Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20111120/fcf74f24/signature.pgp

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list