options used to compile packages
admin at prnet.org
Sat Jul 16 10:08:44 UTC 2011
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so
it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non
working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon
installing gdm and is dependencies from packages, everything worked
correctly. Therefore I thought there might be other default options. I
am sorry that I cannot be more precise, but I tried it 2 months ago, so
I do not remember exactly. I think I will try it again from scratch with
latest ports tree and give you more precise information.
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 10:36 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/07/2011 08:44, David Arendt wrote:
> > I want to compile packages from the ports collections with exactly the
> > same options that have been used to compile the official packages from
> > the official freebsd package collection. Is the var/db/ports directory
> > used to compile the official freebsd package collection available
> > somewhere ? If not, it would be very good to make it available as ports
> > default options seem to be different from options used to compile
> > official packages.
> Official packages are compiled using the default options in each port.
> What have you found where that is seemingly not the case?
> You can see the logs from the port build clusters on
More information about the freebsd-questions