a perl question

Matthew Seaman m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Thu Jan 6 09:49:52 UTC 2011


On 05/01/2011 22:15, RW wrote:
> Personally I find that using cat makes things simpler and less error
> prone when reusing  pipelines in shell history.
> 
> For example it's easier to edit 
> 
>      cat file | foo
> 
> into 
>    
>      cat file | bar | foo
> or   cat file? | foo
> 
> than editing 
> 
>      foo < file
> 
> into
> 
>      bar < file | foo
> or   cat file? | foo

Little known factoid -- shell redirections can occur *anywhere* on the
command line.

% > foo cat
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
% < foo tr 'a-z' 'm-za-l'
mnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijkl

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew at infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20110106/f08f7862/signature.pgp


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list