Backtick versus $()
freebsd at edvax.de
Thu Feb 24 23:42:22 UTC 2011
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten <Ggatten at waddell.com> wrote:
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period.
> It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
> It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure.
> It doesn't use any memory or other resources, $hit, it doesn't
> even need to be installed; it just "magically" works.
> There you have it.
The standard reply to "is better" or "is the best" is
"I don't like" followed by any arbitrary attribute,
like "but I don't like the color" or "I don't like
the file names". :-)
Meanwhile, I've looked into mksh and found out that
giving it a standard prompt (user at host:path$) is not
very easy and involves copying two lines from the
manpage (search for PS1) into a config file. It's
not that you can use bash's prompt 1:1 (or csh's).
Completition and history behaviour is nice, better
than bash, in my opinion, and equal to csh (which I
prefer in this regards).
Oh "prefer" - it's all very individual, that's why the
system's default shell should be replaced by punched
cards. Everyone likes colorful punched cards. :-)
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions