Backtick versus $()
perrin at apotheon.com
Thu Feb 24 23:01:33 UTC 2011
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:39:24PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> > What we have not yet determined is:
> > 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
> Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
> would prefer that the standard shell be at least Bourne-compatible. I
> use csh for root for all the reasons that you shouldn't change your
> root shell. I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't
> even have command recall. I don't know how many times I've keyed in a
> nicely composed off-the-cuff conditional only to have it fall flat. I
> have to remind myself to start zsh first when working as root, or start
> getting used to using toor instead, or just always use sudo.
The toor account seems like the right answer here.
In general, I actually prefer the csh-style syntax for an interactive
shell, personally. I would be willing to deal with sh as the default
shell, and make changes to use tcsh instead as needed, though. Would I
would not want is to go the other direction -- to change the default
shell to something with too many dependencies and licensing more
restrictive than FreeBSD's preferred license.
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20110224/0d0ddb3f/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions