difference between cvsup and csup?
nightrecon at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 12 04:51:21 UTC 2011
Foo JH wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
> instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
> no-gui perspective.
> Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps educate me on how
> this came to be?
I'm certainly not any kind of expert, but please note by examining the
dependencies you will notice cvsup requires ezm3. This is a portable version
of Modula-3 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modula-3 ), upon which cvsup is
Csup is a rewrite of cvsup in the C language, and as such can be included as
part of the base operating system. It is only linked against a few system
libraries. This also means it can be built using the same tools and system
compiler whenever the system itself is updated.
Csup is faster, built-in, and has no third party dependencies. Theoretically
it should have less potential for problems. Cvsup is a third party port,
which itself depends on other third party ports.
More information about the freebsd-questions