frank at shute.org.uk
Sat Aug 6 22:49:16 UTC 2011
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 08:26:39AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox.
> > >
> > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox.
> > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under
> > current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much
> > difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are
> > recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reason?
> Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In
> fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the
> killer feature.
Despite using Fluxbox for a number of years, I wasn't even aware of
tabbing. The only thing I can think of tabbing is xterms but I use
tmux for that. What do you use tabbing for?
> That, and it has a better license than OpenBox.
Never worried about the license.
Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20110806/91218d71/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions