perrin at apotheon.com
Sat Aug 6 14:44:04 UTC 2011
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote:
> > >
> > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox.
> > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox.
> Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under
> current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much
> difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are
> recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reason?
Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In
fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the
That, and it has a better license than OpenBox.
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20110806/6e3f976c/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions