Matthew Seaman m.seaman at
Fri Sep 24 21:13:35 UTC 2010

On 24/09/2010 21:05:45, Derek Funk wrote:
> There was a post some time ago someone was complaining that FreeBSD
> still uses and archaic filesystem and not a new FS like ext4.  Some
> replied, seeming like a code contributor, with a very sounded reply. 
> What is that reply?


or words to that effect.  Linux has nothing comparable.



Not that UFS2 comes off badly when compared to ext{3,4}.  There's
something pretty dodgy about a filesystem that insists on being fsck'd
every 180 days or 30 remounts.

Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP:     Ramsgate
JID: matthew at               Kent, CT11 9PW

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list