nealhogan at gmail.com
Fri Sep 24 02:07:29 UTC 2010
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber <glen.j.barber at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
>>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
>>> vim-like (among other things ;-).
>> Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm
>> developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site:
>> "On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and
>> xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C."
>> What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad?
In the end, you need not take yourself so seriously. The thread was
generic enough to allow for some rhetorical flourish. I suggested
something . . . pointed out that is written in C (as did the homepage)
. . . AND you concluded some sort of insult; not my problem.
Do you need a rim-shot for every joke?
More information about the freebsd-questions