perrin at apotheon.com
Fri Sep 24 00:35:22 UTC 2010
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
> vim-like (among other things ;-).
Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm
developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site:
"On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and
xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C."
What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad?
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20100924/c6903f1e/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions