The nightmarish problem of installing a printer

Jerry freebsd.user at
Tue Sep 21 18:43:44 UTC 2010

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:47:27 +0200
Polytropon <freebsd at> articulated:

> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:36:00 +0200, "C. P. Ghost"
> <cpghost at> wrote:
> > > At the moment there was a program (or any other kind of
> > > facility) that makes Winprinters accessible by *ANY* OS (not
> > > only FreeBSD, but maybe all BSDs and Linusi and Solaris and
> > > who knows what else), MICROS~1 would start violently screaming
> > > as someone is eating from their cake. Keep in mind that
> > > Winprinters are an important target platform for home users who
> > > PAY for "Windows" and PAY for a "compatible" printer. They pay
> > > once every two years or so. MICROS~1 and the printer manufacturers
> > > can't stand it if one uses their products too long, as long-term
> > > use does imply NO FURTHER SALES. And now imagine that a user
> > > can fully use all features of a formerly-Winprinter all-in-one
> > > ink pee copier scanner fax machine - where would be his need to
> > > buy a "Windows" to do that as he can now use FreeBSD for free?
> > 
> > As far as I understand this, Microsoft doesn't manufacture those
> > winprinters, so why would they screem if those printers were able
> > to run on other platform too?
> Very simple: Whenever you are using FreeBSD (or any other operating
> system that is not "Windows"), you are NOT using "Windows".
> MICROS~1's monopoly is based upon three pillars: Mind share, usage
> share, and in conclusion, market share. That again is what matters
> to printer manufacturers, as they are told the "secret keys" about
> how to make their printer work on "Windows".

There is no "secret key" mindset involved. Peruse the MSDN and and you
will find tons of documentation on designing and writing drivers for
virtually anything you can imagine that is currently available on the
Window's platform. It is to Microsoft's advantage to have as many
products as possible operational on their platform. They even have
specialized forums to answer technical questions regard driver

> > You can even see it the other way: for every winprinter manufactured
> > (or, more precisely, for every windriver sold), Microsoft may get a
> > fixed share due to patent royalties from the manufacturer. So,
> > suppose a manufacturer sells more of his winprinters to
> > BSD/Linux/Solaris/... folks because we had this shim, it would
> > translate to more patent royalties to Microsoft too.

I have not been able to locate any documentation that that would
substantiate your claim that Microsoft receives any
reimbursement/compensation from device manufacturers. Would you please
post the source of your claim.
> That's not logical as the package, the shiny box on the shelf that
> the customer wants, already contains a CD (or today, a DVD) with
> drivers for "Windows", as this is the PC, and there's nothing else.
> Users of non-"Windows" operating systems are a niche market that
> does not persist in the scope of manufacturers. They are happy
> selling more and more cheap units (than fewer more expensive units).
> For them and for MICROS~1 it's a win-win situation, as the customer
> always pays.

Printer manufacturers, or manufacturers of other devices for that
matter, sell what the public wants. The public in general wants
inexpensive printers. I can guarantee you that if there were no market
for it, it would not be offered. I know several users with $50 printers
that are used only a few time a month or less. Purchasing a more
expensive unit would not be cost effective. Everyone does not need a
$2000+ laser printer. Manufacturers are smart enough to fill that niche.

> > So it is in Microsoft's interest not only NOT
> > to kick and scream, but actually to encourage those winprinters
> > by publishing the needed interfaces. It can only increase sales, and
> > they will get more kickbacks from those additional sales.
> Insignificant amounts, does not pay. The MICROS~1 concept of software
> ecosystems does not tolerate anything "different". Keep in mind the
> three pillars mentioned before - they would be in danger.

Keep in mind that you have failed to produce one shred of
documentation to back up your claim of "kickbacks".

Jerry ✌
FreeBSD.user at

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list