The nightmarish problem of installing a printer
freebsd at edvax.de
Tue Sep 21 15:43:24 UTC 2010
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:42:22 +0200, "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost at cordula.ws> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
> Is that really so? How about writing some emulation shim like ndis(4) for
> winprinters? Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm not a Windows systems
> programmer, but this is what I'm thinking about.
One big problem is that "Windows" doesn't equal "Windows". I had
customers who intendedly bought some printer, then needed to switch
to another "Windows", and then found their printer useless as there
was no specific driver available anymore. Creating compatibility
layers for printer drivers that do not care about compatibility at
all is like shooting a moving target. As I am not a "Windows" person,
I could only imagine that this would be much more difficult than
printer manufacturers (who sit "at the source") agreeing to simply
use an existing and documented standard.
> So, in both cases, we have stable API/ABI interfaces on both sides
> of the windriver binary blob: 1/, 2/ at the upper half, and 2/ at the bottom
I really doubt about a "stable interface", or situations as described
above wouldn't have happened.
> So, if we wanted to use those windriver blobs just like in the ndis(4)
> case, all we need is an emulation shim for both interfaces. Maybe 1/ is
> already covered by Wine (?) so we could borrow some code from there;
> and 2/ is basically a matter of mapping the subset of NT calls needed
> to read from and write to Windows ports to Unix calls to read and write
> to our Unix devices.
Keep in mind there are stupid things in the world as patents,
intelellectual property, licensing fees and copyrighted secret
codes. At the moment there was a program (or any other kind of
facility) that makes Winprinters accessible by *ANY* OS (not
only FreeBSD, but maybe all BSDs and Linusi and Solaris and
who knows what else), MICROS~1 would start violently screaming
as someone is eating from their cake. Keep in mind that Winprinters
are an important target platform for home users who PAY for
"Windows" and PAY for a "compatible" printer. They pay once
every two years or so. MICROS~1 and the printer manufacturers
can't stand it if one uses their products too long, as long-term
use does imply NO FURTHER SALES. And now imagine that a user
can fully use all features of a formerly-Winprinter all-in-one
ink pee copier scanner fax machine - where would be his need to
buy a "Windows" to do that as he can now use FreeBSD for free?
Of course, this consideration is very far away from any technical
understanding - as typical for lawpersons who make money from
> But the basic idea remains: the interfaces on both sides of the
> windriver binary blobs is pretty stable and (I think) not a secret at all.
In that case, I would ask myself: Why hasn't it been done already?
If your assumption was right, it would already work. As it currently
does not work, I would check your assumption. :-)
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions