Jail question

[Ian Smith]

In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 333, Issue 2, Message: 1
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 bdsfbsd at att.net wrote:
 > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry <freebsd.user at seibercom.net>  
 > wrote:
 > 
 > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
 > > Fbsd8 <fbsd8 at a1poweruser.com> articulated:
 > >
 > >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
 > >> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task
 > >> of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get
 > >> qjail from here.  http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/
 > >
 > > I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually accepted
 > > and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks or so. Perhaps
 > > there is a specific reason why this port has not been accepted/released
 > > into the ports system. Have you, or whom ever submitted the port,
 > > requested clarification as to why it has not been accepted/released?
 > > Before issuing a blank condemnation of the port's department it would
 > > seem like the logical course of action. If you don't receive a
 > > satisfactory reply with two weeks, then it might be worth escalating
 > > the matter.
 > >
 > > Just my 2¢.
 > >
 > 
 > I'm pretty sure I've seen this conversation between the same people before.
 > 
 > Ah, yes:
 > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg235282.html
 > 
 > Noting that Aiza = FBSD8...

Also posting at various times as {fbsd1,fbsd_user,joeb}@a1poweruser.com 
= Joe Barbish, reputed author of qjail.  Never admits to using aliases, 
especially when appearing as 'someone else' in support of his position.

The thing that amazes me most about qjail is that there has never been 
one single mention of it in freebsd-jail at freebsd.org, where jail kernel 
work, utilities and usage are developed, debugged and discussed.

cheers, Ian