Like it or not,
Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software
in the core
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Wed Oct 6 21:16:38 UTC 2010
>>>>> "RW" == RW <rwmaillists at googlemail.com> writes:
RW> It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's
RW> required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if
RW> it's needed.
But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or
unknowing, willing or unwilling?
Seems like an onerous burden. Is it well-documented?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list