Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software in the core

Randal L. Schwartz merlyn at stonehenge.com
Wed Oct 6 21:16:38 UTC 2010


>>>>> "RW" == RW  <rwmaillists at googlemail.com> writes:

RW> It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's
RW> required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if
RW> it's needed.

But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or
unknowing, willing or unwilling?

Seems like an onerous burden.  Is it well-documented?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list