FreeBSD and large harddrives
fbsdq at peterk.org
Fri Nov 19 10:40:37 UTC 2010
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter <fbsdq at peterk.org> wrote:
>> I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
>> and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to
>> the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
>> With 'ZFS: do not give it all your HDD'
>> [ http://www.freebsddiary.org/zfs-with-gpart.php ]
>> You don't even need to have drives that are exactly the same.
>> Completely not tied to any hardware....
> Wow! I'm learning more and more and I'm really beginning to like ZFS!
> Question: What happens if 1 drive out of say 4 fails in a pool? And what
> about hotswapping a (faulty) drive? Is this still possible with ZFS? Can I
> actually replace a Raid 5 setup with a ZFS settup and have the same data
> security if drives fail?'
Easily can be done. zpool mirror on a desktop, I recently just did a
'zpool offline' one of the drives, unplugged it from my sata port, plugged
in another drive, and put it into the pool - all with desktop running. No
esata, just cheap sata controller [biostar mobo] with AHCI enabled in BIOS
and loader.conf. [My version of cheap esata and "offsite backups"]
Make sure to use labels when adding drives to pool. With gpart labels, I
can plug a drive into any port and FreeBSD/ZFS will pickup the label and
no need to worry about putting drives into correct port/controller.
You might want to try raidz instead of raid-5, but I've no experience with
that except for what I've read. [
More information about the freebsd-questions