Multiple tun loadbalancing question

Wed Nov 10 01:23:40 UTC 2010

Ok,

Here it comes my ppp.conf

default:
 set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command
 set timeout 180
 enable dns
 accept dns
 allow users mjl
 add default HISADDR
 set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0
 disable ipv6cp
 disable mppe
 disable vjcomp
 disable acfcomp
 disable deflate
 disable pred1
 disable protocomp
 disable lqr
 deny chap


claro:
 set device /dev/cuaU6.2
 set phone "*99#"
 set authname clarogprs
 set authkey clarogprs999
 set dial "ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \
         \"\" \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CSQ OK \
         AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"igprs.claro.com.ar\\\" OK \
         AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CGATT? OK \
         AT+COPS? OK \
         ATDT*99# CONNECT"
 set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
 add! default HISADDR


movistar:
 set device /dev/cuaU2.0
 set phone "*99#"
 set authname internet
 set authkey internet
 set dial "ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \
         \"\" \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CSQ OK \
         AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"internet.gprs.unifon.com.ar\\\" OK \
         AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CGATT? OK \
         AT+COPS? OK \
         ATDT*99# CONNECT"
 set ifaddr 10.0.0.11/0 10.0.0.12/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
 add! default HISADDR


personal:
 set device /dev/cuaU0.1
 set phone "*99#"
 set authname gprs
 set authkey gprs
 set dial "ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \
         \"\" \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         ATZ OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CSQ OK \
         AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"gprs.personal.com\\\" OK \
         AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \
         AT+CGATT? OK \
         AT+COPS? OK \
         ATDT*99# CONNECT"
 set ifaddr 10.0.0.21/0 10.0.0.22/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
 add! default HISADDR

First of all i will try with PF

It seems to me easier than other clues :-)


C-ya
Leonardo Santagostini


2010/11/10 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagostini at gmail.com>

> Hello All, in a few moments i will start making some test with the
> suggestions you give me.
>
> I will tell you how things are going.
>
> Thanks all for reply!
> Yours,
>
> Leonardo Santagostini
>
>
> 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten <Ggatten at waddell.com>
>
>> Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless.  I'd like to get my
>> web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they
>> will...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethundr at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM
>> To: Gary Gatten
>> Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
>>
>> This might be worth looking into as well!
>>
>> It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by
>> yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of
>> the Apache project:
>>
>> http://trafficserver.apache.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten <Ggatten at waddell.com> wrote:
>> > If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp
>> is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is
>> 100% likely :)
>> >
>> > Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic
>> amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use
>> connection A, other hosts use B, etc.  You can even get fancy and route
>> based on application and host if you wish.  Ci$co calls this Policy Based
>> Routing.  I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar
>> functionality.  My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about
>> that.
>> >
>> > As for "bonding" or aggregating your connections to appear as a single
>> one - not an option AFAIK.
>> >
>> > G
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagostini at gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM
>> > To: Gary Gatten
>> > Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
>> > Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
>> >
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and
>> Personal.
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> > Leonardo Santagostini
>> >
>> > 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten <Ggatten at waddell.com<mailto:Ggatten at waddell.com>>
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections "must" be
>> from the same provider.  In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable
>> connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting
>> the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real
>> world.  In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased
>> towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to "work" - it wouldn't
>> provide much benefit.
>> >
>> > Just curious, what provider are you using?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > <font size="1">
>> > <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext
>> 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
>> > </div>
>> > "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
>> >  and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
>> >  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> >  any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
>> >  and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>> >  received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>> >  return email and delete this email from your system."
>> > </font>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Here's my RSA Public key:
>> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9
>>
>> Share and enjoy!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <font size="1">
>> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in
>> 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
>> </div>
>> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
>>  and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
>>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>  any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
>>  and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>>  received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>>  return email and delete this email from your system."
>> </font>
>>
>>
>