Per core frequency control
Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listmail at stillbilde.net
Tue Nov 9 13:17:19 UTC 2010
On 09.11.2010 11:56, David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading through cpufreq(4) and in the bugs section it mentions that per
> core (or CPU) frequency control is not supported. That all cores/CPUs have to
> be at the same speed.
>
> What is the reason for that?
>
> Is it an infrastructure problem with FreeBSD or has it just not been
> implemented?
>
> And how will the recent work on event timers (and a "tickless" kernel) impact
> on this problem?
You did read the "symmetric" part of "symmetric multi processor" didn't you?
It's a limitation of the technology. One clock.
//Svein
--
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
/"\ |Svein Skogen | svein at d80.iso100.no
\ / |Solberg Østli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831
X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein at jernhuset.no
/ \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13
| | svein at stillbilde.net
ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6
ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail at stillbilde.net
Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4
+-------------------+-------------------------------
|msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575
|svein at jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
------------------------------------------------------------
Picture Gallery:
https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20101109/c911c7e2/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list