ZFS License and Future
freebsd.user at seibercom.net
Sun Nov 7 23:06:04 UTC 2010
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:45:07 -0500
Chris Brennan <xaero at xaerolimit.net> articulated:
> LibreOffice (Libre is Latin for free) is a functional
> name as is (personally I don't like the name, but I hated
> StarOffice's name too!) and has potential. But DF faces an uphill
> battle in re-educating the world that LibreOffice is OpenOffice under
> a new name.
I tend to disagree with your assessment there. OO has never really
progressed passed being a poor copy of MS Office 97. Tieing the new
nomenclature to the old product might prove counter productive. I know
several users who would avoid it just on that basis alone. A new name
with the appropriate PR might prove to be a boon for the product. I do
agree that the new name is lacking though. Obviously, no real thought
went into choosing a new product name. Unfortunate indeed.
FreeBSD.user at seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
If a can of Alpo costs 38 cents, would it cost $2.50 in Dog Dollars?
More information about the freebsd-questions