ZFS License and Future

[Chris Brennan]

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> >  On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) <
> > svein-listmail at stillbilde.net> wrote:
> >
> > >  > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps
> > > flagging
> > > > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's
> nothing
> > > > bad :D
> > >
> > > I suppose they are the PGP signature?
> >
> > You could suppose that but I'm on a windows machine at the moment so not
> > going to risk it and ... your attachment shows as a PGP Signature ... his
> > didn't, just 'noname' for the file name....
>
> That supposition is correct.  I find it odd that someone else's signature
> is labeled as such and mine is not for you; for me, I see mine labeled as
> PGP signatures as well.  I'm currently using GnuPG with Mutt; I don't
> know if that makes a difference.
>
>

Shouldn't .... but just to be clear .... Chad's signature-attachement is
claimed to be safe! And the answer is 42.


Did you know...

If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages,
but what's worse is when you play it forward....
                                      ...it installs Windows 2000

   -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org
<http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>




> --
> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
>