perrin at apotheon.com
Wed Jun 2 12:54:33 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:33:44PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> The ed(1) is *extremely* useful when it comes to editing text files on
> the fly in shell scripts (i.e. without user interaction).
This is why I don't consider ed the kind of abomination that edlin was;
it exists within a stronger command toolset so that it can actually be
put to good use. Plus, y'know, there are also other editors available in
Unix systems these days, so I have something other than just ed available
for interactive editing. When edlin was all I had available, and it was
stuck in the DOS world where there was nothing like a Unix shell to make
reasonable use of it, it was nothing but frustration.
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20100602/57d7b5d6/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions